Zhang Yi, a lawyer from Gaopeng Institute, won a complete victory in responding to the Indian anti-dumping case for the Chinese tire vulcanizer industry
On August 27,2021,the Ministry of Commerce and Industry of India announced the final ruling of the second sunset review of anti-dumping against Chinese tire vulcanizers.In this case,our senior partner,Zhang Yi,the lawyer's trade team,represented China's largest export enterprise,Guilin Rubber Machinery Factory Co.,Ltd.,in an anti-dumping defense.In the final determination,our firm achieved a successful outcome in anti-dumping cases involving zero tax rate and industry non harm termination,with no taxation.We have successfully opened up one of the world's most important export markets of hundreds of millions of yuan per year for the entire rubber vulcanizing machine industry in China.
In 2008,the Indian government began an anti-dumping investigation on tire vulcanizers exported from China to India.After the initial anti-dumping review and the first final review,it has imposed high anti-dumping duties for about 13 years so far,greatly impeding and reducing the export of Chinese tire vulcanizer industry to India.This case not only completely ended the 13 years of trade barriers mentioned above,but also is a typical case in which the Chinese tire manufacturing equipment industry has achieved complete success in responding to foreign trade protection cases such as anti-dumping.Especially under the unfavorable situation of India's large-scale trade protection rod surrounding China's export trade,it is indeed not easy to achieve such results.
(This article is translated by software translator for reference only.)
Related recommendations
- Gaopeng represents Zhejiang export enterprises to obtain the lowest tax rate in Ukraine's anti-dumping investigation against China
- Lawyer Fan Chao's team represented a headhunting company and won the lawsuit
- Lawyer Gao Peng assists in the successful issuance of China Energy Conservation Solar Convertible Bonds
- Gaopeng won a comprehensive victory in a financial entrusted wealth management contract dispute case on behalf of a certain company